Deep Beat free essay sample

The practically chewable cellar air, thick with residue and dampness, encompasses me as the incomplete dividers overflow with protection like hills of cotton treats. I stand, confronting 50 companions stuffed tight, where even the littlest development makes one brush against another. A single fan suspended from the roof rafters by two bungee strings tosses minuscule whirlwinds of protection in a useless endeavor to subside the warmth. In my  ­personally overseen cellar music scene, affirmation is free, beside the gift of a solitary jar of food. My band and I stand ready, gradually distorting the pitch of guitar strings, hitting jumbled drums, and shouting â€Å"check† into the PA framework over the murmur of gab. I offer up this melodic gathering to encourage innovativeness, self-obligation, and network trying to battle the developing agnosticism of the cutting edge world. The blinding overhead lights cause me to consider restless evenings under a brilliant book light, remembering the severely legit verses of my preferred groups. We will compose a custom article test on Profound Beat or on the other hand any comparable theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Collection handouts in the long run changed into verse by e.e. cummings and Sylvia Plath, arousing my own beautiful interests. Through their motivation, I transformed from cumbersome and ailing in certainty to singing my sections with a puzzling direness inside a couple of creeps of an outsiders face. Broken bits of optimistic discussion from the group invoke a memory of the way that the most extravagant one percent of the world possesses in excess of 40 percent of the riches and that one of every five female undergrads in America have been explicitly attacked. For the thousandth time, I recall my situation as the pioneer of my schools section of Amnesty International and recharge my life pledge to doing combating these issues. The synthetic scent of a Sharpie invades my noses. I look down to discover its source: an enormous dark X on the rear of each hand, representing my promise to straight-edge living. This decision to go without liquor, drugs, and easygoing intercourse is my personal fight between cultural catastrophe, my destiny, and a goals to assume responsibility for a mind-blowing heading. It is my assurance to perceive the failings of past ages and endeavor to maintain a strategic distance from the entanglements that bait people from an important presence. My heart pounds with a bass drum, and my chest resonates as a force string snakes around my neck, dangling down to the receiver in my grasp. While the observers eyes swell with mouths agape, and heads gesture with hands pounding the beat to the melody on their chests, we are totally associated. Through the music that is abounding in this soaked tomb, we become an amazing power of affection and insistence, pushing our aggregate inventiveness and moral decisions. I yell unhesitatingly, and my voice blasts insubordinate echoes of cheerful vitality through sterile circular drive neighborhoods. â€Å"In this universe of either-or, we haul toward the other entryway. There is quite a lot more covered underneath impeccable faces and dyed white teeth,† I breathe out these words and my band plays, consoling and hardening all my gutturals shout. My own interwoven of pictures of my objects of worship †Ian Mackaye, the vocalist of Minor Threat; Walt Whitman, the artist; Soren Kierkegaard, the savant; and Che Guevara, the progressive †circles and flashes through my brains eye. My last breath leaves. I gaze at the roof, lying on my back with the amplifier held to my middle, feeling total cleansing tranquility, depleted from my endeavor to communicate and prompt open mindfulness. In-your-face music isn't the gullible whimpering of intoxicated mavericks, however the flash lighting the fire in my heart that will keep on enlightening my way toward activity for a mind-blowing remainder.

Shakespeare, William The Taming Of The Shrew Battle Of The Sexes Essa

Shakespeare, William: The Taming of the Shrew Battle of the Sexes In the play The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, Petrucio perceives, regards and wants Katherine's quality of character. Petrucio is an astute man who sees past veneers since he utilizes them notwithstanding a great deal of incongruity himself. (II, I 46) (II, I 283 - 89) He is stimualted by Katherines harsh tone and unforgiving activities. He demonstrates this from various perspectives all through the play. Petrucio isn't in urgent need of cash, however comes to Padua to locate a rich spouse. He says ?To wive and flourish as best I may,? at the point when he is revealing to Hortensio why he came to Padua. He implies that he has come to discover a spouse and get more extravagant. From Petrucios reaction to his companion Hortensio (I,ii 64 - 75), it may be said that Petrucio came to Padua to make himself more extravagant by marriage regardless of how vomited the lady. I don't accept this is valid. He additionally discloses to Hortensio that his dad has kicked the bucket and that he is out in the world to pick up encounters he can't at home, and to discover a spouse optional. (I,ii 49 - 57) Petrucio appreciates verbal game and a non-traditional comical inclination. Petrucio encircle himself with neither manageable nor acclimating individuals. You can even observe this in his hirelings. His workers like him without a doubt and make the most of his stimulations. A case of this is when Petrucio and his hireling man Grumio get into a difference about thumping on the door. Intelligent of this is Petrucio's techniques to ?charm? Katherine. His strategies are game like and ridiculous. For example, when he pounds Grumio in light of the fact that Kate's pony falters, or appearing up late to the wedding. While demonstrating Katherine how ludicrous she is about things, he is likewise making her feel extraordinary, which is something she never felt throughout everyday life. He likewise says that ?This is the best approach to slaughter a spouse with graciousness.? (IV,i 211) This is his pursuing technique for when he causes the spouse to feel to useful for everything encompassing her. When they have supper once he gripes ?Endanger choler planteth outrage?. since of ourselves are irascible?. (IV, I 177) While Petrucio may not concur with what society has resolved to be legitimate, he knows about the significance to adjust. He knows the methods of society and that he should exhibit this to Katherine, who has no respect for open introduction. Petrucio is completely taken by Katherine's character as Bianca's excellence and bashfulness takes the other admirers. It is in Hortensio's depiction of Katherine that Petrucio is caught. He depicts her as affluent, youthful, excellent, appropriately raised, unfortunately curst, clever and forward. (I, ii 85 - 89) Though Hortensio discovers his depiction of Katherine loathsome, Lucentio thinks that its fascinating and is he himself have a portion of these characteristics and is pleased with it. The way that these characteristics are viewed as negative in Kate, however not in Petrucio is an impression of the cultural guidelines of the 1500's. Petrucio claims that she could be ?As foul as Florentious love? (I, ii 69) It appears that he is turned on by the test. Albeit nobody accepted that Petrucio would have the option to stand Katherine, he says that he should have her as a spouse, and that he was destined to tame her. Gremio asks ?Who will embrace to charm curst Katherine?have you let them know of her deficiencies (I,ii 184 - 187) When Katherine is recounted the wedding courses of action she says ?I'll see thee hang'd on Sunday first.? (II, I 301) This, or the slap he arrives at later doesn't appear to dishearten the solid willed Petrucio by any means. It doesn't give the idea that Petrucio wouldn't like to vanquish or really tame Kate. He is a man who is exceptionally certain about himself and needn't bother with somebody to help his inner self. He additionally appears as though he would be disillusioned on the off chance that she were restrained to effectively, in light of the fact that he appears to appreciate the challenge. Petrucio appears to cherish difficulties and continually encircle himself with testing individuals. It appears his ideal match would be a lady who could deliver a test and hone

The Worst Advice Weve Heard About Plagiarizing

The Worst Advice Weve Heard About Plagiarizing Plagiarism isnt a fun topic. Lets face itâ€"anyone who has spent time in academic pursuits has heard the stern lectures from professors warning of the dangers of plagiarism. The consequences of it can be equally unsettling: a failing grade, a feeling of disgrace, loss of credibility, and even expulsion are all very real possibilities.But dont worry, weve got your back, and will discuss the absolute worst advice weve heard about plagiarizing. Pay attention and youll avoid the embarrassment and destruction of credibility that plagiarism can bring.Bad Idea #1: You can use whole sentences or paragraphs from WikipediaSince Wikipedia content is created by a conglomeration of several writers and editors, there is a false assumption that entire sentences or passages can be lifted from it and used in otherwise original papers.The operative word here is false. Regardless of how many writers contributed to a passage or content, and regardless of the fact that the content is online and highly ed ited, its still plagiarism to claim the text as your own. In addition, Wikipedia content will be easily picked up by any online plagiarism detector since it is a highly visited website and therefore highly ranked in search engine algorithms.Its also important to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not considered to be a legitimate source in academic research and writing. Treating it as a source could result in a lowered grade and plagiarizing it could most certainly result in thatâ€"or worse.Bad Idea #2: You can piece together pieces of several different free online essays on the topicIf youve ever watched an online plagiarism detector perform its search, youd know that this is likewise bad advice. Specifically, these programs are designed to crawl millions of webpages to find content that is word-for-word of the text submitted to them. It doesnt matter if the content is pulled from a hundred different sources, plagiarism detection software can find all of themâ€"including short passages of approximately five words.There is also a false assumption that goes along with this one, stating that as long as the copied passages are less than a certain percentage of the original work, its fine to plagiarize. Whether you copy a passage of five words or 500â€"the act (and therefore, the consequence of that act) is the same.Whether you copy a passage of five words or 500â€"its still plagiarism. Photo by Green Chameleon on Unsplash.Bad Idea #3: You can plagiarize since there are no original ideas leftWhile its true that there is nothing new under the sun, this reality doesnt give you an excuse to claim anothers work as your own. When writers and literary scholars mention that there are no original ideas left (another way to state the adage I mentioned above), they are referring to story archetypes that have been used since the dawn of human existence. And sureâ€"most storylines or plots have been done before, in some version, either in movies or books. Characters change and se ttings change, but there are certainly repetitions of conflicts and archetypes in literature that cant be avoided.However, there will always be a way for you to approach the topic with fresh eyesâ€"and with YOUR eyes. Even if your thoughts are similar to others, you will still express them in a unique way because you are a unique individual. There is no one else in the entire world who looks, thinks, and processes ideas exactly like you do. This means that the work you produce, whether it is writing or research or both, should be entirely original in the way it is written and compiled. Since every writer is an individual, it is highly unlikely that he or she will choose word-for-word the exact phrasing of another writer who has broached the topic previously.Bad Idea #4: If the source is obscure enough, no one will know you plagiarizedTechnology is an amazing thing and plagiarism software is part of that emerging technology. While the plagiarism-checker programs have varying abilitie s and scopes of their search, your theft of anothers words could always be discovered with the right one. The question then becomes: Are you willing to run that risk?Even if a source is entirely offline (very few are nowadays) and completely obscure, a professor paying attention will potentially be able to detect plagiarism because the writing style and word choice will be so very different than your own. Many professors hand out in-class assignments and tests that require you to write in class. This means that they have a sample of your writing, which clues them in to your writing style and the extent of your vocabulary. Anything you turn in that is in glaring contrast will immediately be suspected of plagiarism by a professor who is looking for it.Bad Idea #5: You wont get penalized if you accidentally plagiarize somethingAs nice as this would be, it simply isnt true. Many universities have a strict no-plagiarism policy, and any instance of it could be dealt with harshly, includin g expulsion, even if it was accidental. In fact, freelance writers who publish online content often run their work through a plagiarism detector to make sure they havent accidentally plagiarized someone. As a professional writer, this type of accidental plagiarism could still have the same consequences of intentional plagiarism, including lawsuits, losing their job, and loss of credibility in their industry.The fact is: its an easy mistake to make, especially when you read a lot of content about a particular topic. Sometimes, thoughts go through our brains that we assume to be original but are actually thoughts weve read somewhere and simply forgot we had read it (in that exact combination of words).Professors understand this and have likely dealt with the situation in their own research and writing. However, any responsible researcher or writer will take steps to ensure that his or her work is original and that it cites all sources quoted, whether directly or indirectly. This invol ves checking for plagiarism, even of the accidental variety, which is easy to do with all of the free plagiarism-checker websites available. When you submit your work for class or for a writing assignment given to you by your company, you should take these same steps.Bad Idea #6: Everyone does it, so you should tooI think most mothers have a similar reply when their rebellious teenager uses this argument to justify doing something against house rules: If everyone jumps off a bridge, would you follow them?While its a somewhat comedic anecdote, there is truth in it. Just because its widely done doesnt mean its right. And just because other people get away with it doesnt mean you will avoid getting caught, as well. In much the same sense that a police officer or judge will not be inclined to ignore laws broken simply because other people break themâ€"neither will a professor be inclined to excuse plagiarism, simply because he or she has seen it attempted often over the span of their ca reer.Beyond these facts, its important to understand that plagiarism is theftâ€"theft of anothers words and ideas, while claiming them as your own. In the same sense you would not be a thief in other facets of your life, dont be a thief of anothers writing and research.Bad Idea #7: If it isnt copyrighted, you can plagiarize itCopyright law is not as complex as you might think. In fact, once something is published online or as an original hardcopy, it retains an original copyright, whether the author attaches the copyright symbol () to it or not.Obviously, not every author would pursue litigation for copyright infringement, but the possibility is still there. This is especially true if you publish content onlineâ€"whether academic or otherwiseâ€"without attributing it to its original author. Just as there is software to detect plagiarism, there is likewise software for authors and website managers to use that detects if anyone is using their original content online. With this softwar e, they are able to find the website that is using their original content, as well as the websites owner (through information you provided when you registered the website). This means that the threat of lawsuits is always there, particularly if you are publishing online.Even if youre not publishing it online, plagiarism detector software can locate the original content online and mark yours as being plagiarized. And this software is freely available for professors or employers to use.Plagiarism can ruin your reputation and result in expulsion.Bad Idea #8: If you just rewrite another persons paper, it isnt plagiarizingThis is one of the most commonly held myths about plagiarismâ€"thinking that rewriting or rearranging the words of an entire section or paper is somehow not plagiarism. While this method might help you avoid some online plagiarism detectors, depending on the source youre rewriting, it can still be highly visible to your professor that you have done this.The problem with this method of plagiarizing is that it is both underhanded and still not your original thought. There are some cases in which you will need to do this in order to avoid quoting so much, you still need a citation following the rewrite to direct the reader toward the original source.

The Worst Advice Weve Heard About Plagiarizing

The Worst Advice Weve Heard About Plagiarizing Plagiarism isnt a fun topic. Lets face itâ€"anyone who has spent time in academic pursuits has heard the stern lectures from professors warning of the dangers of plagiarism. The consequences of it can be equally unsettling: a failing grade, a feeling of disgrace, loss of credibility, and even expulsion are all very real possibilities.But dont worry, weve got your back, and will discuss the absolute worst advice weve heard about plagiarizing. Pay attention and youll avoid the embarrassment and destruction of credibility that plagiarism can bring.Bad Idea #1: You can use whole sentences or paragraphs from WikipediaSince Wikipedia content is created by a conglomeration of several writers and editors, there is a false assumption that entire sentences or passages can be lifted from it and used in otherwise original papers.The operative word here is false. Regardless of how many writers contributed to a passage or content, and regardless of the fact that the content is online and highly ed ited, its still plagiarism to claim the text as your own. In addition, Wikipedia content will be easily picked up by any online plagiarism detector since it is a highly visited website and therefore highly ranked in search engine algorithms.Its also important to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not considered to be a legitimate source in academic research and writing. Treating it as a source could result in a lowered grade and plagiarizing it could most certainly result in thatâ€"or worse.Bad Idea #2: You can piece together pieces of several different free online essays on the topicIf youve ever watched an online plagiarism detector perform its search, youd know that this is likewise bad advice. Specifically, these programs are designed to crawl millions of webpages to find content that is word-for-word of the text submitted to them. It doesnt matter if the content is pulled from a hundred different sources, plagiarism detection software can find all of themâ€"including short passages of approximately five words.There is also a false assumption that goes along with this one, stating that as long as the copied passages are less than a certain percentage of the original work, its fine to plagiarize. Whether you copy a passage of five words or 500â€"the act (and therefore, the consequence of that act) is the same.Whether you copy a passage of five words or 500â€"its still plagiarism. Photo by Green Chameleon on Unsplash.Bad Idea #3: You can plagiarize since there are no original ideas leftWhile its true that there is nothing new under the sun, this reality doesnt give you an excuse to claim anothers work as your own. When writers and literary scholars mention that there are no original ideas left (another way to state the adage I mentioned above), they are referring to story archetypes that have been used since the dawn of human existence. And sureâ€"most storylines or plots have been done before, in some version, either in movies or books. Characters change and se ttings change, but there are certainly repetitions of conflicts and archetypes in literature that cant be avoided.However, there will always be a way for you to approach the topic with fresh eyesâ€"and with YOUR eyes. Even if your thoughts are similar to others, you will still express them in a unique way because you are a unique individual. There is no one else in the entire world who looks, thinks, and processes ideas exactly like you do. This means that the work you produce, whether it is writing or research or both, should be entirely original in the way it is written and compiled. Since every writer is an individual, it is highly unlikely that he or she will choose word-for-word the exact phrasing of another writer who has broached the topic previously.Bad Idea #4: If the source is obscure enough, no one will know you plagiarizedTechnology is an amazing thing and plagiarism software is part of that emerging technology. While the plagiarism-checker programs have varying abilitie s and scopes of their search, your theft of anothers words could always be discovered with the right one. The question then becomes: Are you willing to run that risk?Even if a source is entirely offline (very few are nowadays) and completely obscure, a professor paying attention will potentially be able to detect plagiarism because the writing style and word choice will be so very different than your own. Many professors hand out in-class assignments and tests that require you to write in class. This means that they have a sample of your writing, which clues them in to your writing style and the extent of your vocabulary. Anything you turn in that is in glaring contrast will immediately be suspected of plagiarism by a professor who is looking for it.Bad Idea #5: You wont get penalized if you accidentally plagiarize somethingAs nice as this would be, it simply isnt true. Many universities have a strict no-plagiarism policy, and any instance of it could be dealt with harshly, includin g expulsion, even if it was accidental. In fact, freelance writers who publish online content often run their work through a plagiarism detector to make sure they havent accidentally plagiarized someone. As a professional writer, this type of accidental plagiarism could still have the same consequences of intentional plagiarism, including lawsuits, losing their job, and loss of credibility in their industry.The fact is: its an easy mistake to make, especially when you read a lot of content about a particular topic. Sometimes, thoughts go through our brains that we assume to be original but are actually thoughts weve read somewhere and simply forgot we had read it (in that exact combination of words).Professors understand this and have likely dealt with the situation in their own research and writing. However, any responsible researcher or writer will take steps to ensure that his or her work is original and that it cites all sources quoted, whether directly or indirectly. This invol ves checking for plagiarism, even of the accidental variety, which is easy to do with all of the free plagiarism-checker websites available. When you submit your work for class or for a writing assignment given to you by your company, you should take these same steps.Bad Idea #6: Everyone does it, so you should tooI think most mothers have a similar reply when their rebellious teenager uses this argument to justify doing something against house rules: If everyone jumps off a bridge, would you follow them?While its a somewhat comedic anecdote, there is truth in it. Just because its widely done doesnt mean its right. And just because other people get away with it doesnt mean you will avoid getting caught, as well. In much the same sense that a police officer or judge will not be inclined to ignore laws broken simply because other people break themâ€"neither will a professor be inclined to excuse plagiarism, simply because he or she has seen it attempted often over the span of their ca reer.Beyond these facts, its important to understand that plagiarism is theftâ€"theft of anothers words and ideas, while claiming them as your own. In the same sense you would not be a thief in other facets of your life, dont be a thief of anothers writing and research.Bad Idea #7: If it isnt copyrighted, you can plagiarize itCopyright law is not as complex as you might think. In fact, once something is published online or as an original hardcopy, it retains an original copyright, whether the author attaches the copyright symbol () to it or not.Obviously, not every author would pursue litigation for copyright infringement, but the possibility is still there. This is especially true if you publish content onlineâ€"whether academic or otherwiseâ€"without attributing it to its original author. Just as there is software to detect plagiarism, there is likewise software for authors and website managers to use that detects if anyone is using their original content online. With this softwar e, they are able to find the website that is using their original content, as well as the websites owner (through information you provided when you registered the website). This means that the threat of lawsuits is always there, particularly if you are publishing online.Even if youre not publishing it online, plagiarism detector software can locate the original content online and mark yours as being plagiarized. And this software is freely available for professors or employers to use.Plagiarism can ruin your reputation and result in expulsion.Bad Idea #8: If you just rewrite another persons paper, it isnt plagiarizingThis is one of the most commonly held myths about plagiarismâ€"thinking that rewriting or rearranging the words of an entire section or paper is somehow not plagiarism. While this method might help you avoid some online plagiarism detectors, depending on the source youre rewriting, it can still be highly visible to your professor that you have done this.The problem with this method of plagiarizing is that it is both underhanded and still not your original thought. There are some cases in which you will need to do this in order to avoid quoting so much, you still need a citation following the rewrite to direct the reader toward the original source.